|
Prepared
Statement By John Whomes: 22/05/00
I am John Dennis Whomes. I am aged 38 and i live in Suffolk. I am
the younger brother of Jack Arthur Whomes who on 20th January 1998
was wrongly convicted of the Rettendon Murders.
It is ironic that I have been brought to this Police Station, as
it was here on Friday 17th May 1996 that Jack was charged with the
Rettendon Murders. I have sat in my cell and wondered what my brother
must have been going through 4 years ago last Friday.
I have followed my brother's case very carefully from the outset
and I have had the opportunity of watching the law in action. Unfortunately,
what i have witnessed is the system failing innocent people.
My brother Jack is currently serving a life sentence for three murders
he did not commit His wrongful conviction has not only left Jack
serving a life sentence but his family and friends too.
The same goes for my brother's co-defendant Michael John Steele
and his friends and family. To date, my brother and his co-defendant
have had their 2 applications lor leave to appeal their convictions
refused.
What they are seeking is an appeal before the Court Of Appeal (Criminal
Division).My frustration with the legal system in this country has
led me to campaign on behalf of Jack and Michael.
Today, I woke at 4 a.m. at my home in Suffolk and travelled down
to the M25 where I carried out a peaceful protest in support of
the campaign to free Jack and Michael.
My only intention was to campaign to free my brother. It was always
my intention to be co-operative with the authorities and never my
intention to damage any property or to harm any person.
This protest has achieved its aims successfully. I am a fully qualified
parascender and therefore safety is always paramount in what i do,
hence the reason I was wearing a fluorescent jacket.
I also chose the particular gantry with care some time ago. It has
spare space above the hard shoulder and as the banners used today
did not obscure any road signs so the safety of motorists was guaranteed.
Today in Chelmsford a Police Disciplinary Hearing was due to begin
featuring 2 police officers, DC Wolfgang Bird and DS Philip Stimpson.
who were directly relevant to my brother's case. At my brother's
trial, the Prosecution disclosed material involving these 2 officers.
One of those officers was the informant handler of the principal
prosecution witness at my brother's trial, the witness formerly
known as Darren Nicholls. Both police officers have had every opportunity
to attend court hearings involving my brother.
Indeed on one occasion their legal representatives participated
in the murder trial on behalf of their clients. My brother's legal
representative made an application to be present at the Police Disciplinary
Hearing of these 2 Police Officers did not consent to this application.
The Chief Constable Of Bedfordshire was not even able to exercise
his discretion to consider this application. Four years on from
my brother's arrest an inequality within the legal system continues.
Today I decided to exercise my right to freedom of expression and
my right to peaceful protest. I felt driven to do what I did today
because the law has failed my family.
I had no intention to interfere with traffic equipment. I'd hardly
want to set back my brother's case by causing an accident therefore
I gave very careful consideration to what was doing.
The last thing I'd want to do is to cause any danger to anyone else
or myself.
|