26/07/01
- PCC to rehear Taylors' complaint against Mail
By Jean Morgan
Press
Gazette
The parents of the Taylor sisters, freed on appeal from
life sentences for murdering the wife of Michelle Taylors
former lover, have withdrawn an application to the High
Court for a judicial review of a Press Complaints Commission
ruling. It follows a PCC promise to rehear their complaint
in September.
The Taylors say they have fresh evidence to put forward
to support the complaint against the Daily Mail for an article
headlined, Why I believe they are murderers,
written by Jo Ann Goodwin in June last year. In February,
the commission initially declined to adjudicate the complaint,
made on the grounds of inaccuracy.
The reasons given were that it was made by a third party
and that the matters and allegations it contained would
be more appropriately dealt with in a defamation hearing.
The Taylors would always be free to return to their High
Court judicial review application if they are not satisfied
with the September hearing.
Meanwhile, the commission awaits the outcome of television
newsreader Anna Fords application to the court for
a similar review of the PCCs decision rejecting her
complaint of invasion of privacy. Ford was photographed
on a beach in Majorca with her fiance, former astronaut
Colonel David Scott, from whom she has recently split.
The photographs were used by the Daily Mail and OK! magazine.
The commission had ruled that Ford could not expect privacy
on a public beach. At last weeks hearing, David Pannick,
QC for the PCC, said: This is a beach overlooked by
apartments.
Its not simply a public beach but a beach in a tourist
area at the height of the tourist season. Fords
QC, Geoffrey Robertson, said his client had asked for the
judicial review after she had seen an article in The Independent
by commission chairman Lord Wakeham discussing the outcome
of her complaint, which she considered unexpectedly
boorish.
Unusually, judgment was reserved following last weeks
hearing. An answer is usually given straight away. With
the end of the current legal term near, Mr Justice Silber
may not give judgment until the court resumes in the autumn.